Search for: "Trinity Highway Products"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 2:12 pm
” The judge also discussed the possibility of the president of Trinity Highway Products attempting to intimidate a witness and possibly committing perjury. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 12:50 pm
According to whistleblower Joshua Harman, Trinity Industries failed to report a change made to highway guardrails to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:28 pm
Trinity was required by law to alert the National Highway Administration (NHWA) of the design change, but it did not. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In a statement, the attorney general said: “Trinity had an obligation to test and seek approval for its equipment, but instead, they sold the Commonwealth thousands of unapproved products that had not been properly tested to ensure they would keep motorists safe. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 5:42 pm
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) reviews crash-test data and other information to determine whether a product meets the required safety protocol. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 8:07 am
Evidence indicates that Federal Highway Administration officials ignored complaints about Trinity Industry, Inc. guardrail dangers. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
According to the company’s 2013 annual report, its sales of highway products, including guardrails, amounted to $336 million. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 8:33 am
Jack Todd, a spokesman for Trinity, states that the company has a “high degree of confidence” in its product. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:18 am
” Now at the center of multiple product suspensions and personal injury lawsuits, Trinity… [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:00 pm
[Click here to see the rest of this post]Read more about Guardrail Safety fro the Federal Highway Administration:FHWA Federal Register Notice requesting credible data on the ET-Plus Guardrail End Terminal, December 24, 2014005 Crashworthiness Tests: ET-Plus Guardrail End Terminal System, December 16, 2014Guardrail 101 - Purpose, Function and Crashworthiness of Guardrails, December 10, 2014 (PDF, 487 KB)ET-Plus Retesting Information, December 10, 2014Memorandum - ACTION: E- Plus W-Beam… [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:15 pm
ABC News recently reported that according to highway safety experts, highways in nearly every state have been outfitted with the redesigned Trinity guardrail. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:33 am
In a 1,300+ word article, Bloomberg News reports that Joshua Harman, claiming Federal whistle-blower status, is suing Trinity Highway Products and its owner, Trinity Industries, “alleging the company made quiet design changes that transformed guardrails intended to reduce injuries into potentially deadly hazards. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
In another case of what may be safety equipment doing more harm than good, states across the country are joining in a boycott of certain guardrail end terminals manufactured by Trinity Highway Products, LLC, a business of Texas-based Trinity Industries, Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:42 am
When Joshua Harman decided to take on Trinity Highway Products LLC, questioning their redesign of a highway guardrail used on interstates across the United States, he was determined to expose what he saw as a safety hazard. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:46 am
The Federal Highway Administration and Texas-based Trinity Industries, which manufactures the railheads, contend that they meet crash-test guidelines and are safe, according to the reports. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Trinity Guardrails Remain on Highways NationwideA Texas jury found that Trinity Industries defrauded the government by selling an altered guardrail design without notifying the government agency as required by law. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Trinity defends its product stating they confidently believe it is safe. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:17 am
Last month, we published a blog post entitled “Testing of Trinity Guardrails Begins. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
” The guardrail is made by Trinity Highway Products of Dallas, and lawsuits against the company say “a small alteration to a device at the beginning of guardrails, known as an end terminal or guardrail head, causes the device to perform incorrectly. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:21 pm
The Relator’s claim amounted to an allegation that the defendants (collectively, “Trinity”) failed to disclose to the government modifications in their design and manufacturing process, and that the government would not have purchased Trinity’s guardrail products had it known about the changes. [read post]
